Do You Know Egypt? - The Sequel
Since we were so used to playing verbal jokes on him, Mr. Egypt treated every
remark by students who had a habit of arguing with him with suspicion, even when
remarks were meant to be serious. There was a amusing interaction between Chan Yau Seng and Mr. Egypt. During one lesson, Egypt said bridges were typically made of wood or metal. Yau
Seng added a very innocent comment "they can also be made of ropes" -
second nature for some of us to pass comment either out of convoluted
friendliness or out of love of giving him a jab every now and then.
Mr.
Egypt thought he was trying to be funny or trying to argue that bridges should
not be of wood or iron and responded with agitation "I did not say they
cannot be made of ropes!".Yau
Seng could not understand why Mr. Egypt appeared to be mad. So he
repeated "I only said bridges can also be made of ropes"
implying no intention to ridicule or argue. Mr. Egypt still could not get it and angrily repeated with increasing
loudness "I did not say they cannot be made of ropes!!" Still
shocked Yau Seng said "I did not say you said they cannot be made of
ropes. I was only trying to say they could also be made of
ropes." At this point Mr. Egypt's blood pressure
reached its boiling point and Yau Seng was
invited in no uncertain terms to "take off his specs". We all knew what happened after Yau Seng took off his specs and it was certainly not a happily ever after.
Another
convoluted way of expressing our affection for Mr. Egypt was by the way we responded
to him greeting the class in Chinese "Dar Jia Wǔ Ān" meaning
"good afternoon everyone" at the start of each period. We would
respond very musically with "Xiān Shēng Wǔ
Ān........................." with "Ān" dragged for as long as
the last student who can keep it going. In English it was equivalent to
chanting "good afternoon sir.....ir........ir.......ir..........." Mr. Egypt did not express like or dislike for
our way of expression of affection but it did become the unspoken standard way
of exchanging greetings between us before the start of each class.
Classes
in those days got to enjoy about 2 weeks of total freedom at the end of each
term and after term exams. Teachers could do whatever they wished to with
their classes or to do nothing. Mr.
Egypt also happened to not hold believers in god or gods or religions with much
credibility or respect. He was roped into pontificating and arguing
passionately against religion during one of those full freedom days of Sec. 3B
Sc to a small section of the students. Other students were free to do
whatever they wished.
While
arguing strongly against believing in god(s), he spotted Swee Chuang who
happened to just join the group discussion innocuously. He was
immediately asked "What do you
believe in? Which god do you believe in? Swee Chuang gave a highly
humourous answer with a straight face "Egyptian Gods". Mr.
Egypt did not yet know at that time he was already well known as "Mr.
Egypt" among his circle of students and he thought Swee Chuang was just another
petty rascal trying to tease him. He looked at Swee Chuang and said
"so you are trying to be funny?" without asking anything further and
without any invitation "to remove his glasses". Swee Chuang must be highly relieved at his
narrow escape – might even have thanked the real god he believed in but the reason was he escaped being slapped because he was not wearing any spectacles!
Although
Mr. Egypt did not believe in religion nor religious leaders, he did exhibit his
deep appreciation for and understanding of famous philosophical sayings on how
humans should conduct themselves in life. He was asked for his preference
among two seemingly identical profound sayings but expressed in different ways. The
first saying was by Confucius "Do not do to others what you do not want
others to do to you." The
second was by Jesus Christ "Do unto others what you would like to be done
unto yourself." To the students the two sayings are two sides of the same coin. But Mr. Egypt he chose Confucius over Jesus. Could it be because Confucius
was considered a philosopher teacher while Jesus was considered a religion
founder?
We must
confess the Mr. Egypt’s rationale of choice remained a mystery to this day much like the
mystery behind how the pyramids were built . Mr. Egypt might have explained his rationale before
but it was probably too profound and abstract for young rascal minds to understand.
Contributed by Chen Wen, Swee Chuang and Yau Seng
Contributed by Chen Wen, Swee Chuang and Yau Seng
Comments